Sign in to view Sumit’s full profile
or
Already on LinkedIn? Sign in
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view Sumit’s full profile
or
Already on LinkedIn? Sign in
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Gurugram, Haryana, India
Sign in to view Sumit’s full profile
Sumit can introduce you to 10+ people at Procol
Join with email
or
Already on LinkedIn? Sign in
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
5K followers
500+ connections
Sign in to view Sumit’s full profile
or
Already on LinkedIn? Sign in
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with Sumit
Sumit can introduce you to 10+ people at Procol
Join with email
or
Already on LinkedIn? Sign in
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View mutual connections with Sumit
or
Already on LinkedIn? Sign in
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Sign in to view Sumit’s full profile
or
Already on LinkedIn? Sign in
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
Activity
5K followers
-
Sumit Mendiratta posted thisWhat a time to be in tech. Three years ago at Procol, we debated for hours on a simple feature request: how to name a procurement event. A customer uploads 50 items spreadsheet - bearings, fasteners, bolts. What should the event be called? Should we pick the category? The most expensive item? Something personalized? We finally settled on: "Event #123 - January 14 - Bearing, Fastener +48 more". It felt clever. It took forever to figure out. Today, an AI can run that entire procurement event end-to-end. Title, categorisation, supplier matching, negotiations, everything. The thing that unsettles me: I've been in tech long enough to remember when this was science fiction. Three years ago, we couldn't auto-name a file. Today, you can build entire products. It's not just fast progress. It's having to unlearn what you thought was hard. Every assumption about what's possible needs to be rethought. That feeling, equal parts exciting and unnerving is what makes this moment so surreal.
-
Sumit Mendiratta posted thisBetting on each other If one executive order in Washington can displace our top talent, maybe our export should be products, not talent. The $100k H1B fee makes that clear. Most large Indian enterprises today spend a major chunk of their software budget on global companies like Salesforce, SAP, Microsoft, and Oracle. For years, we’ve paid billions, believing international means better. But here’s the truth nobody likes to say: global brands aren’t always better for us they’re often better marketed. Indian companies pay more in money, time, and flexibility while getting less: higher bills, slower support, and products designed for other markets. Too often, these tools are force-fitted into India, costing us more and giving us less control. I’ve seen this up close while building an enterprise procurement software from the ground up. At Procol, we worked hand-in-hand with our customers, listening closely, sweating every detail, and treating their goals as our own. I'm grateful to those early partners who trusted us, especially when the easier choice would have been a large global brand. That trust pushed us to build a product truly superior to legacy players, uniquely crafted for Indian customers from day one, not just adapted later. Today, we’re winning both at home and on the global stage. We’re not the only ones. LambdaTest, Darwinbox, PingSafe, and many others are equally obsessed, building from India, counted among the best in the world. The gap between global and homegrown is real, but closing it is within reach. China has shown how fast things can change with shifts in policy and mindset, and there’s no reason India can’t do the same. The real shift is in mindset: buyers and builders betting on each other, and going out of our way to support one another until momentum builds. Builders need to earn trust by delivering new benchmarks of innovation and quality. Buyers help by backing startups with close collaboration, confidence, and pricing comparable to global brands. We have the world’s best tech talent, the fourth largest and the fastest-growing economy. When trust and incentives are shared, we all win and progress accelerates. India can’t only be a source of talent for the world. We have to empower our own builders, keep our best minds here, and shift from being importers to exporters of world-class products. Let’s build, buy, and truly back Indian because the world won’t truly value us until we do.
-
Sumit Mendiratta shared thisWe are truly entering a new era of software development. Old SDLC playbooks are obsolete today. Programmers need to unlearn old approaches and adapt to this new paradigm. Ajay Shrivastava has articulated these changes really well.Meet "Softrician": Software plumber in AI era!Meet "Softrician": Software plumber in AI era!Ajay Shrivastava
-
Sumit Mendiratta reposted thisSumit Mendiratta reposted thisFrom promises to proof! G2 has recognised Procol with top honours in usability, ROI, speed, and performance, which is a testament to our ability to turn procurement goals into measurable results. In a market where every second and every percentage point matters, Procol is the partner enterprises rely on to accelerate procurement transformation and unlock lasting value. Schedule a demo now to see the difference yourself: https://lnkd.in/gEHb3sdT #procol #g2 #summerreport #procurement
-
Sumit Mendiratta reposted thisSumit Mendiratta reposted thisThe networking at ProcureCon? Unmatched. It’s not just who you know - it’s the real connections you make. Who have you connected with today? Tag ‘em below! #ProcureCon #ProcureCon25 #ProcureConIndirectWest #networking
-
Sumit Mendiratta reposted thisSumit Mendiratta reposted this🚀 We’re Hiring at Procol! 🚀 We’re looking for engineers with 1-3 years of experience to join our team at Procol! If you’re passionate about building scalable systems, solving complex problems, and working with an incredibly talented team, this is your chance. If you categorize yourself as a person who thrives in 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗽 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 and is eager to learn, we would be the most thrilled to have you join our 𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿-𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗸𝘀. Please mail your candidature at hiring@procol.in or liza.jain@procol.in with the subject: Job Application for [Position - SDE1 or SDE2 or SDE3] - SSREF #sde1 #sde2 #sde3 #engineering
-
Sumit Mendiratta reposted thisSumit Mendiratta reposted thisWe are #hiring for multiple positions of 𝗦𝗗𝗘-𝟮s and 𝗦𝗗𝗘-𝟯s at Procol If you categorize yourself as a person who thrives in 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗽 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 and is eager to learn, we would be the most thrilled to have you join our 𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿-𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗸𝘀. Please mail your candidature at 𝗵𝗶𝗿𝗶𝗻𝗴@𝗽𝗿𝗼𝗰𝗼𝗹.𝗶𝗻 with the subject: Job Application for [Position - SDE2 or SDE3] - SHIREF See you at office 😊 #sde2 #sde3 #engineering
-
Sumit Mendiratta reposted thisSumit Mendiratta reposted this🚀 We’re Hiring at Procol! 🚀 We’re looking for SDE-2 and SDE-3 engineers to join our team at Procol! If you’re passionate about building scalable systems, solving complex problems, and working with an incredibly talented team, this is your chance. If you categorize yourself as a person who thrives in 𝗳𝗮𝘀𝘁 𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗲𝗱 𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗿𝘁𝘂𝗽 𝗰𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘂𝗿𝗲 and is eager to learn, we would be the most thrilled to have you join our 𝗱𝗲𝗻𝘀𝗲𝗹𝘆 𝗽𝗮𝗰𝗸𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗲𝗮𝗺 𝗼𝗳 𝘀𝘂𝗽𝗲𝗿-𝘁𝗮𝗹𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗲𝗱 𝗳𝗼𝗹𝗸𝘀. Please mail your candidature at hiring@procol.in with the subject: Job Application for [Position - SDE2 or SDE3] - PBREF #sde2 #sde3 #engineering
-
Sumit Mendiratta reposted thisSumit Mendiratta reposted thisClosed my masterclass on AI in Procurement with live demo of Procol’s AI agents in action. Thank you for hosting us — Ai Everything Global. #procurement #AI #UAE
-
Sumit Mendiratta liked thisSumit Mendiratta liked this
-
Sumit Mendiratta liked thisSumit Mendiratta liked thisPocket FM has now crossed $400M ARR. The first $200M took 6 years, the next came in just 12 months. AI changed everything for us. When we started Pocket FM, the idea was to build a new entertainment format - bingeable, bite-sized audio series. We built this category in India, then scaled it to the US and Europe and today it’s part of mainstream entertainment across 20+ countries. While building Pocket, we reimagined the entertainment playbook by pivoting to an AI-native storytelling system. At the core of this AI-native engine is our fiction writing co-pilot, trained on billions of minutes of engagement data. It enables creators to go from a raw idea to a fully dramatized series in minutes, while allowing us to rapidly identify potential blockbusters and adapt stories across languages and cultures almost instantly. Content creation has exploded on Pocket - 300,000+ creators are now producing 80,000+ hours of content every month and this isn’t low-effort content; it’s storytelling people keep coming back to every day. AI isn’t replacing creativity, it’s unlocking it. One creator story recently stuck with me, a first-time creator from Hyderabad whose show found an audience in the US and he made ~$50,000 (₹50 lakh) in a single month. This is democratization of storytelling. Feels like this is just Episode 1. Many more cliffhangers ahead. P.S. We are now free cash flow positive, at ~5% EBITDA.
-
Sumit Mendiratta liked thisSumit Mendiratta liked thisAbsolutely thrilled that Procol is heading to DPW New York 2026 🚀 This is a huge moment for us as we bring our AI agents to the global enterprises—driving what we believe will be a 100x leap in procurement efficiency. Can’t wait to meet, learn, and showcase what we’ve been building—see you in New York City! Procol #enterprise #spend #AI
-
Sumit Mendiratta liked thisSumit Mendiratta liked thisSome news to share about our board at General Catalyst. I'm thrilled to welcome Nikesh Arora as our first lead independent director. Nikesh is a rare combination: someone who thinks like an investor and builds like an operator. He's led some of the most consequential technology organizations in the world, and I've long admired the clarity and ambition he brings to everything he does. Nikesh will join me and Kenneth I. Chenault (our chairman) on the board. My team and I look forward to working closely with him as we continue building GC and supporting the founders we back. At the same time, my partner and close friend David Fialkow is stepping down from the board after 24 years of building this company together. David co-founded General Catalyst, and his fingerprints are on everything we are today, in our culture, our conviction, our commitment to founders. Saying thank you doesn't quite capture it, but: thank you, David. The good news is that David isn't going far. He'll remain deeply engaged with the company, and I know our founders and team will continue to benefit from his wisdom and generosity. Grateful for where we've been. Excited for where we're headed.
-
Sumit Mendiratta liked thisSumit Mendiratta liked thisTwo days. Many perspectives. A powerful exchange of ideas. From global capital flows and India’s growth trajectory to long-term investing and strategic choices in a disruptive era, the Asia Pacific M&A Summit 2026 brought together leaders and dealmakers to unpack what’s shaping the future. Across plenaries, panels and conversations, the focus stayed on what matters most: how capital is being deployed, where value is being created, and what it takes to navigate the next phase of dealmaking with clarity and conviction. #MandASummit #DealMaking #IndiaGrowthStory Sanjeev Krishan | Mohit Chopra | Vineet Satija | Akshay Kapur | Swapnil Deorukhakar | Koushik J | Rajesh Vig | Himanshu Goyal | Krishna (Kris) Agarwala | Amit Agarwal | Suryaannsh Khanna, CFA | Kanchana Ramamurthi | Debashish Panigrahi | Aditya Agarwal | Lucy Stapleton | Steve Cater | Steven Jeong | Surabhi Upadhyay
-
Sumit Mendiratta liked thisSumit Mendiratta liked thisOut of 24 global procurement tech platforms evaluated by Everest Group, Procol is the only Indian company that made the cut. Named an 'Influencer' in Everest Group's Innovation Watch: Agentic AI Applications in Procurement, this recognition isn't just a milestone. It's a signal. The world's largest enterprises are moving from procurement tools that track to systems that act. Agentic AI that runs workflows, drives decisions, and delivers outcomes, not dashboards. That's what we've been building. Thank you to the 200+ enterprises who trusted us to reimagine how procurement works. This one's for you. #Procol #AgenticAI #procurement #AgentsofProcol #ProcurementAI https://lnkd.in/eqeRxTCKProcol's Agentic AI Procurement Platform named in Everest Group's Matrix, the only Indian platform to make the cut Procol's Agentic AI Procurement Platform named in Everest Group's Matrix, the only Indian platform to make the cutProcol's Agentic AI Procurement Platform named in Everest Group's Matrix, the only Indian platform to make the cut Procol's Agentic AI Procurement Platform named in Everest Group's Matrix, the only Indian platform to make the cut
-
Sumit Mendiratta liked thisSumit Mendiratta liked thisThis is… something. Peter Bailis. CTO of Workday ~17,000 employees, one of the biggest enterprise software companies on the planet. Just joined Anthropic as Member of Technical Staff. No fancy title. No VP, no C-suite. Just "staff." And he took it anyway... That tells you more about where the smartest people think the next decade is being built than any market report ever could. What's your take?
-
Sumit Mendiratta liked thisSumit Mendiratta liked thisWe are excited to share that Nava (formerly Kluisz) has raised a $22M Series A led by Greenoaks with continued backing from RTP Global and Unicorn India Ventures. As AI adoption accelerates, the limitations of legacy cloud infrastructure are becoming more evident. Enterprises today require tightly integrated compute and software, purpose-built for AI workloads. That is the opportunity we are building for. Nava is developing a full-stack AI compute platform, combining high-performance GPU infrastructure and AI-native orchestration, to power the next generation of AI applications across Asia. This fundraise enables us to deepen our platform, expand across APAC, and bring on senior leadership talent across engineering and go-to-market. Read more: https://lnkd.in/gj25-aez Or here: https://lnkd.in/gQCGnFFu Abhinav Vamshidhar Abhijeet Surya Tarun Madhur Anil Bhaskar Sarita Sajith Sanjay Giridhar PK Nick Swetha Bharat Anupam Maheswara
-
Sumit Mendiratta liked thisSumit Mendiratta liked this"If you haven't figured out how to be profitable after raising 100 crores of capital, you should bloody kill the business." ~ Karthik B. Reddy
Experience & Education
-
Procol
********** * ***
-
*****
**********
-
*** *****
****** ******** *********
-
******* ********* ** **********
******** ** ********** ********* ******** ******* undefined
-
View Sumit’s full experience
See their title, tenure and more.
Welcome back
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
New to LinkedIn? Join now
or
By clicking Continue to join or sign in, you agree to LinkedIn’s User Agreement, Privacy Policy, and Cookie Policy.
View Sumit’s full profile
-
See who you know in common
-
Get introduced
-
Contact Sumit directly
Other similar profiles
Explore more posts
-
Madhav Kasturia
Zippee • 60K followers
Rapido just declared WAR on the 30% commission food delivery model 🚨 For almost a decade, since food delivery platforms like Zomato & Swiggy scaled across India, restaurants have accepted a painful deal. If you want access to customers through these apps, you give away 25–30% of every order. Let’s say someone orders food worth ₹300. Around ₹75 goes as platform commission. About ₹20 goes as delivery charges paid by restaurants. Another ₹10–₹20 goes into packaging. And if the restaurant wants visibility on the platform, there are additional marketing spends on ads. By the time everything settles, the restaurant keeps roughly ₹180–₹190 from that ₹300 order. Now look at Rapido’s new product, Ownly, which recently launched citywide in Bengaluru. Restaurants are not required to pay any platform commission at all. Customers simply pay a delivery fee, while the restaurant keeps the entire order value. And restaurants responded fast. Around 20,000 Bengaluru restaurants joined within weeks. But the most interesting signal came before Ownly even launched. Swiggy previously owned a 12% stake in Rapido. Soon after Rapido began testing food delivery in August 2025, Swiggy exited. The stake was sold in September 2025 for roughly ₹2,400 crore to Prosus and WestBridge (about 2.3× return). Financially, it was a great exit. Strategically, the message was even clearer. Swiggy chose to walk away before Rapido entered its core battlefield. The company already operates: → ~5 million rides daily → ~2 million riders (“Captains”) → 400–500+ cities → 30–50 million monthly users Food delivery simply plugs into an existing logistics network. Right now, Rapido itself is burning roughly ₹40–45 crore every month while expanding. But the strategy is obvious. They’re attacking the one thing restaurants hate the most: COMMISSION!! For years, restaurants were told: “30% commission is the cost of growth.” Rapido just showed them a version of the market where that cost is ZERO! And once restaurants see that…Good luck convincing them to go back.
167
37 Comments -
Piyush Singh
BeyondNull • 3K followers
Gurugram-based proptech startup OfficeBanao has raised nearly $4 million (around Rs 36 crore) as part of a $7.7 million funding round led by Lightspeed Venture Partners, with participation from Mangum II and Medra Family. The round values the startup at about $70 million post-money. Founded in 2022 by Tushar Mittal along with Akshya Kumar and Divyanshu Sharma, OfficeBanao operates a technology-enabled platform for commercial office interiors and workspace buildouts. follow for more Piyush Singh
13
-
Shashi Hegde
The Roaring Lion Company • 17K followers
Dunzo's downfall can be attributed to several key factors: - Failure in Quick Commerce: Dunzo's attempt to become an ultra-fast grocery delivery platform, competing with Swiggy's Instamart, Zomato's Blinkit, and Zepto, ultimately failed due to high infrastructure costs, operational demands, and stiff competition. - Mounting Losses and Debt: The company's losses ballooned from ₹464 crore in FY22 to ₹1,801 crore in FY23, with accumulated debt of around ₹600 crore, making recovery difficult without external intervention. - Over-reliance on Investors: Dunzo's dependence on investors and inability to raise funds led to a significant decline in its valuation, from $770 million to $25-30 million. - Mismanagement and Strategic Missteps: The company's decision to shift focus from its core hyperlocal delivery model to quick commerce proved challenging, and its technological solutions failed to deliver results in the real world. - Reliance Investment Backlash: The $240 million investment from Reliance Industries in 2022 provided temporary relief but created new challenges, including disagreements over funding and strategic direction. - External Pressures: Dunzo faced legal issues, including an insolvency application filed by creditors and delayed salary payments to employees, further exacerbating its financial woes. - Financial struggles: Despite raising over $450 million in funding, Dunzo faced significant financial difficulties, including a substantial loss of ₹1,801 crore in FY23, up from ₹464 crore in FY22. The company's high cash burn rate and inability to secure additional equity funding exacerbated its financial woes. - Intense competition: Dunzo struggled to compete with well-funded rivals like Zepto, Blinkit, and Swiggy Instamart, which offered similar services with deeper pockets. This intense competition eroded Dunzo's market share, with Blinkit leading at 46%, Zepto at 29%, and Swiggy Instamart at 25%. - Operational cutbacks and layoffs: Dunzo reduced its operations and market presence over two years, leading to widespread layoffs and salary delays for employees. This ultimately affected the company's ability to deliver services efficiently. - Leadership changes and departure of key personnel: The departure of cofounder and CEO Kabeer Biswas, who joined Flipkart to lead its quick commerce venture, Minutes, marked a significant blow to Dunzo. Other cofounders, including Mukund Jha, Dalvir Suri, and Ankur Agarwal, had also exited the company. - Creditor issues: Dunzo's creditors, including Reliance Retail and Google, explored acquiring the startup but ultimately didn't pursue it. The company's unpaid dues led creditors to take legal action, approaching the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT). These factors cumulatively contributed to Dunzo's shutdown, with its app and website displaying error messages and leaving hundreds of vendors, employees, and delivery workers unpaid. #Dunzo #reliance #Quicklogistic #startupfailure
2
-
Jai Vardhan
Entrackr • 21K followers
SCOOP: Palmonas is set to raise Rs 200 Cr in a Series B led by XPONENTIA Capital, with Vertex participating. The new round comes at a 3.8X valuation premium. Its FY25 revenue surged 40X to Rs 39 Cr, while the firm’s profit stood at Rs 4.3 Cr. Break by Mukul Manchanda https://lnkd.in/gEJAjCmp
57
1 Comment -
Nishant Mittal
Kavisha.ai • 48K followers
So OYO's third attempt at going for the IPO has fallen apart. This time, it's Softbank which has refused to go ahead, asking the company "to first improve its earnings". While this is great news for retail investors. What does it mean for OYO's founder, its employees, and the company itself? Short answer: 1. The founder could be forced out anytime now 2. Another lot of employees could be fired, and 3. The company will be run by management driven by investors, mainly Softbank The core history behind this starts in 2019, when Agarwal personally bought back ~ $1.5 B worth of OYO shares from early investors (like Sequoia, Lightspeed) through a Cayman Islands entity called RA Hospitality Holdings. That debt ($1.2B of which was financed via debt from Japanese & international banks) was reportedly guaranteed by SoftBank, which was already a major investor in OYO. In that transaction, Softbank played both sides of the trade: It guaranteed Ritesh's loan to facilitate the deal, while also benefiting from the pump in valuation being the largest shareholder. Solely because of that transaction, OYO's valuation had reached $9.6B. However, at the time, reports also said that "Ritesh personally borrowed ~ $1.2B from a consortium of banks, while the remaining ~$300 Mil came from his own equity and funds." But that was a joke, of course. He never had that kind of money. It was basically a leverage play on his existing shares, routed through an offshore Cayman entity, essentially leading to a Book-entry equity injection of his shares counted again in new form. And then began the attempts of dumping this ponzi on retail investors. In 2021, OYO tried to IPO at a $12B valuation. This was brought down to $10B, before the whole plan eventually got stalled. In Aug 2022, the valuation was dialled back to $7-8B, because the whole company was looking at going for a toss if it didn't inject money ASAP. In Oct 22, DHRP addendum was filed, and the company got the SEBI approval by March. But now the valuation estimates were at $5-6B. The IPO was cancelled. Then came January 2024, where the company's valuation was marked at $2.5B in an emergency liquidity injection situation. It raised some $35M to prevent itself from going totally bust (this was pitched as a "pre-IPO" round). Finally, in January 2025, the third IPO plan was laid out (updated DRHP). Which was cancelled just yesterday. Now that the IPO has been canceled, what we're looking at is URGENT repayment of: 1. $383M personal loan by Ritesh Agarwal (First tranche of the total ~$2.2B loan used for the founder-led buyback), and 2. $465M of the Term Loan B taken by OYO. Since both of these loans were contingent on the IPO; without that, what you're basically looking at is Softbank stepping in to: 1. Pay for Ritesh's loan and taking control of his shares sooner or later, and 2. Make the company "more efficient", so it can pay the $70M/yr interest on the Term Loan (its PAT was $25M last year). This is it.
390
30 Comments -
Priten Bangdiwala
Founders Ashram • 11K followers
$700M Just Landed Nexus Ventures closed its eighth fund. $700M for India and US startups. Seed to Series A. AI, enterprise software, consumer, fintech. Their portfolio: Zepto, Delhivery, Rapido, @Apollo If you're building in these spaces, the capital is there. The question is whether your traction is. #VentureFunds #Investments #Startups #Capital #Build
69
4 Comments -
Harsh Dwivedi
Medial • 6K followers
10 indian companies that you might not know were yc companies: 1. groww (W18) 2. meesho (S16) 3. razorpay (W15) 4. zepto (W21) 5. orange health labs (S20) 6. khatabook (S18) 7. cashfree payments (S17) 8. lokal (S19) 9. okcredit (S18) 10. innov8 (S16)
126
1 Comment -
Atmaj Pancholi
Self-employed • 2K followers
The Partnership Paradox: Why Your 7 A.M. Uber Still Cancels It’s 7:15 AM. Laptop bag ready, coffee untouched, three apps open — Uber, Ola, Rapido. Not to see if a ride will come, but to see how long the circus will last today. The first request goes out. No one accepts. The app suggests a ₹50 “tip” to “increase my chances.” Ah yes — a modern-day bribe wrapped in UX design. Finally, a driver accepts. Then cancels. Then another accepts. Cancels again. By the third attempt, fares have surged, patience has vanished, and coffee’s gone cold. If you commute daily in India, you’ve lived this loop — frustration in 10-minute installments. And yet, this isn’t chaos. This is design. Or at least, a design that outgrew its discipline. The “Partner” Problem No One Talks About Uber doesn’t hire drivers — it creates partners. Sounds empowering, right? Except this freedom cuts both ways. When you make someone a “partner,” you share the profits — but not always the purpose. The driver becomes a free agent in a system built on shared responsibility. No surge? Cancel. Long pickup? Cancel. Low fare? Cancel. And just like that, a “partner model” becomes a permission model for unpredictability. The 6 A.M. Logic of Cancellation … What feels like unreliability to the customer is actually rational economics to the driver: · Low demand = lower fare per km · Empty runs = wasted fuel · No guaranteed minimum = every minute counts The system doesn’t reward showing up. It rewards waiting for better math. Freedom Without Feedback Is Friction … Rohan Ghorpade recently wrote about Uber’s “Driver Wanted” sign — how it was never about jobs but ecosystem design. He’s right. It was genius marketing — until governance stopped keeping up. Because here’s the thing: Freedom without feedback doesn’t create ownership — it creates optionality. And when everyone in a system optimizes for self, the system itself starts to fail. The Real Issue Isn’t Cancellation — It’s Calibration … Drivers aren’t the problem. Design is. Partnerships are supposed to mean shared upside and shared accountability. But when the structure is tilted toward autonomy, reliability becomes collateral damage. Uber built freedom as structure. Quick commerce built structure as control. And somewhere between the two, trust got lost in translation. The CalmOps Takeaway … Platforms love the language of “partners,” but partnership without rhythm isn’t freedom — it’s fatigue dressed as flexibility. Because in the end: You can scale people. You can scale profit. But if you don’t scale accountability, you’ll keep scaling chaos. #Leadership #SystemThinking #Operations #AutomationStrategy #CalmOps #Uber #Ola #Rapido #Governance #GigEconomy #StructureIsStrategy
1
-
Akash Bagrecha
Jordensky • 13K followers
Startups Raised $134 Mn This Week 22 Deals | 1 M&A Here's Series wise funding details Series B SuperK, a consumer services startup, raised $11.5 Mn in a Series B round from 3STATE Ventures, Mithun Sacheti, Shubman Gill, Blume Ventures, and Xeed Ventures. Series A Netrasemi, a semiconductor startup, raised $12.4 Mn in a Series A round from Zoho Corporation and Unicorn India Ventures. EduFund, a lending tech startup, raised $6 Mn in a Series A round from Cercano Management and MassMutual Ventures. EVeez, an electric MaaS startup, raised $5.4 Mn in a Series A round from Michael & Susan Dell Foundation, Caret Capital, ThinKuvate, Ev2 Ventures, Barbershop With Shantanu, SailThru Ventures, and ah! Ventures. Enlite Research, a vertical SaaS startup, raised $5.3 Mn in a Series A round from Avaana Capital and Claypond Capital. iTuring.ai, an application layer AI startup, raised $5 Mn in a Series A round from Dallas Venture Capital and Mela Ventures. Hudle, a vertical SaaS startup, raised $2.5 Mn in a Series A round from Sky Impact Capital, Physis Capital, Atrium Venture, Blue Tokai, Mahesh Bhupathi, and Gaurav Kapur. Pre-Series A ANNY, a D2C startup, raised $1.2 Mn in a Pre-Series A round from Atomic Capital. Inbound Aerospace, a spacetech startup, raised $1 Mn in a Pre-Seed round from Speciale Invest and Piper Serica. ApClub, a hyperlocal services startup, raised $231K in a Pre-Seed round from Curefit and Pranay Jivrajka. Seed Kluisz.ai, an application layer AI startup, raised $9.6 Mn in a Seed round from RTP Global, Unicorn India Ventures, Blume Founders Fund, Climber Capital, Ritesh Agarwal, Ritesh Malik, and others. Escape Plan, a D2C startup, raised $5 Mn in a Seed round from Jungle Ventures and Fireside Ventures. Grexa AI, an application layer AI startup, raised $1.8 Mn in a Seed round from Utsav Somani, DeVC, Bharat Founders Fund, Vernalis Capital, and others. Ammunic Systems, a defence tech startup, raised $1.1 Mn in a Seed round from India Accelerator and Finvolve. Plenome , a vertical SaaS startup, raised $752K in a Seed round from Ovington Capital Partners, AADI, and Manish Gandhi. Undisclosed Series Gupshup, a horizontal SaaS startup, raised $60 Mn from Globespan Capital Partners and EvolutionX Debt Capital. SUGAR Cosmetics, a D2C startup, raised $5 Mn from Anicut Capital, Stride Ventures, and L Catterton. Bharatsure, a fintech SaaS startup, raised $694K from Inflection Point Ventures, Capital A, and Atrium Angels. Coluxe Fine Jewellery, a D2C startup, raised an undisclosed amount from Startup Sherpas, Ajai Chowdhry, Tej Kapoor, Sairee Chahal, and others. Roast Foods, a D2C startup, raised an undisclosed amount from Pagariya Exports Pvt Ltd. Magma, a manufacturing solutions startup, raised an undisclosed amount from GVFL Limited. KlugKlug , a marketing agency startup, raised an undisclosed amount from undisclosed investors.
23
3 Comments -
Ambika Pande
Silence Laboratories • 10K followers
📊 PhonePe shutting down Pincode seems to prove it: e-comm to fintech works but fintech to ecomm struggles 📊 The big news this week. PhonePe, one of India's leading players in payments & fintech shut down Pincode, which was its ambitious play into getting into B2C commerce, built on ONDC, India's "ecomm as a service" rail (DPI stack) The initial logic of B2C fintechs (Paytm, PhonePe) venturing into commerce seemed to play on the logic of “hey! I have a captive user base. Why should I only facilitate payments? I can sell them other stuff!" But that didn't play out: PhonePe’s Pincode experiments, and Paytm Mall all stumbled, and eventually shut down. However, the reverse has seemed to be quite successful, where big ecomm players are moving into fintech. Over the past few years, we’ve seen Amazon and Flipkart transition from traditional e-comm giants into full stack fintech players: 🚀 Amazon ✅ 2017 - PPI wallet license ✅ 2019 - TPAP (Amazonpay) ✅ 2024 - PA license (domestic) and PA-CB (imports) ✅ 2025 - Acquired Axio (NBFC) 🚀 Flipkart: ✅ 2016 - Acquired PhonePe (UPI App + PPI) ❌ 2022 - Lost PhonePe’s PPI license post split ✅ 2024 - Launched Super money UPI app (separate entity) ✅ 2025 - Acquired BharatX (BNPL as a service infra player) ✅ 2025 - Secured an NBFC license ❓ 2025 and beyond: Payments play is plausible considering FK & group companies (Cleartrip + Myntra) scale 🛒 Big reason for this is that you have "fintech as a service" players, allowing players to launch their own branded products on top of whitelabeled infra. What we don't have is "ecomm as a service." A plug & play platform of buyers + sellers that anyone can plug into and leverage. 🛒 ONDC was meant to bridge that gap. But in reality, the ONDC experience remains fragmented. To actually win in ecomm, one needs deep control over supply chains, merchant onboarding, logistics, returns, and customer experience. There’s no player owning the full stack, and placing interoperability above user experience backfired in ONDC's case. Three years post launch (since 2023), success stories are rare: Juspay’s Namma Yatri being the exception, not the rule. 🛒 Not to say that every ecomm player is going after the fintech play. There are challenges - regulatory complexity is one. To operate as a fintech, you need a license from RBI which is increasing compliance burden and oversight. Zomato’s retreat is a case in point: It secured a PA and PPI license in early 2024, but later surrendered both, and withdrew its NBFC application. Yet plenty of e-comm players stand poised to go full-stack: Meesho, MakeMyTrip, Nykaa, Jio, Tata Neu, Zomato (again), Swiggy, even Zepto got the GMV volume to make fintech a logical next act. The e-comm to fintech trajectory does seem increasingly viable and doing or not doing it is more of a strategic call. Fintech to e-comm faces systemic friction, and without something like “e-comm as a service,” it may remain stalled. 🧠 Deep dive in the comments
76
5 Comments -
Shiksha Mishra
AY Ventures • 34K followers
Two startups. Same market. Same chance. One raised too early. The other was too late. The outcomes will surprise you 👇🏻 Snapdeal→ Raised Funds Too Early Snapdeal initially raised large funds and positioned itself as a leading e-commerce player in India. What they did: Aggressive expansion, diversified offerings, heavy rebranding, and multiple acquisitions. Problems faced: - Execution errors & poor integration of acquisitions - High cash burn and costly decisions - Service failures, delayed deliveries, and eroded customer trust - Fierce competition from Amazon and other well-funded players Result? Growth became unsustainable, financial stress escalated, and Snapdeal lost market share. 📌 Lesson: Raising big too early can drive unfocused growth, operational chaos, and high burn, hurting competitiveness. Byju’s→ Raised Funds Too Late Byju’s prioritized building product quality and acquiring customers organically before raising large funding rounds. What they did: Developed curriculum, improved tech, and scaled cautiously with limited capital. Problems faced: - Slower early growth - Pressure to balance scale with quality - Competitive pressure from better-funded rivals - Later rounds required huge scaling expectations How they overcame it: Focused on unit economics, product innovation, and raised larger rounds later to fuel massive expansion. 📌 Lesson: Late funding slows growth but disciplined focus and strong execution make it highly effective. Timing matters in fundraising. Too early risks scaling before you’re ready. Too late risks missing growth. Make sure your business model is solid and scalable first.” _ _ _ P.S. Want to raise funds to scale your startup? Fill this form and let’s help you become funding-ready👇 https://lnkd.in/gjqKsyb8
59
9 Comments -
Jayesh Marathe
BHARAT URJA ELECTRICALS AND… • 29K followers
Elitecon International's move is massive. Every quarter, this mid cap is rewriting what scale looks like. From Rs 548 crore annual sales to Rs 3,735 crore in just half a year. → Not speculation, not hype, just execution at breakneck speed. This is the kind of business move that separates survivors from dominators. Mergers that create scale, not press releases. Elitecon isn't winning by luck. It's winning by consolidation. Three entities merging in. Deloitte managing the process. Operational efficiency about to multiply. This isn't trend chasing growth. It's strategic growth done right. The stock has already delivered 774% returns from its 52 week low. 9,750% in 3 years. But here's what matters more than the numbers: the company is building for the long term. Stronger balance sheet. Better market positioning. Earnings visibility that institutions demand. From tobacco products to international markets. From Rs 11.43 to Rs 99.89. From small scale to Rs 15,000 crore market cap. This isn't a viral story. It's a value creation story. NCLT approvals pending. Deloitte guiding. Management executing. The rest is just watching it unfold. Disclaimer: For informational purposes only, not investment advice.
179
26 Comments -
Abhishek Mall
KaroStartup • 57K followers
In 2020, BigBasket made ₹3,794 Cr in revenue, at that time, Zepto and Blinkit didn’t even exist. Fast forward to FY 25: BigBasket’s B2C arm, saw its turnover fall 3%. Meanwhile, losses surged BigBasket’s losses for that unit rose to ₹1,851 crore. In the quick commerce space today, Blinkit commands ~ 44-46% market share, followed by Zepto, and BigBasket’s “Now / Instant” share is a small sliver. BigBasket was once India’s grocery king — today, it’s scrambling for relevance in the age of 10-minute delivery, dark stores & consumer impatience. Meanwhile, Blinkit + Zepto + Instamart are hitting 4+ million daily orders (March 2025 numbers) — Blinkit alone delivers ~1.65–1.75 million orders/day. BigBasket’s “now” offering (BB Now / BB Instant) is clocking 0.4–0.5 million daily orders. #startup Why Blinkit / Zepto Are Growing Faster — The Differences. Speed / Promise: Blinkit / Zepto 10-minute delivery via dense network of dark stores. BigBasket: Traditional slotted delivery, constrained reach. Model & Assets: Blinkit / Zepto Asset-light dark store + micro-fulfillment, lean inventory. BigBasket: Full inventory model, big warehouses, higher capital cost. Consumer Habit: Blinkit / Zepto Impulse / top-up purchases (midnight snacks, forgotten items). BigBasket: Planned shopping, full cart, more deliberation. 🎯 Lessons for Founders & Builders. When consumer expectations shift, you can’t cling to legacy models. Speed is not a gimmick — it becomes the moat. Asset-light + hyperlocal is the play in dense cities. Don’t let diversification distract core excellence. You must fight for the last mile — that’s where scale dies.
296
23 Comments -
Mayank Mishra
Makoons Gwalior • 21K followers
🚨 Rapido’s Food Delivery Launch Raises Serious Questions for Swiggy’s Investment 🚨 As the #Co‑Founder & #CEO of BrainShaala - No. 1 Skill Development Company, I’ve always emphasized that strategic investments must anticipate the future. Swiggy’s ~12% stake in Rapido acquired via a $180M investment in 2022 is now under review as Rapido enters food delivery with its Ownly pilot in #Bengaluru. What began as partnership potential is turning into direct competition. Key developments: #Rapido is offering restaurants nearly half the commission charged by #Swiggy and #Zomato, using a fixed-fee model that could lure partners away . Swiggy’s net loss doubled to ₹1,197 crore in Q1 FY26—making capital allocation ever more critical . In its shareholder letter, Swiggy confirmed it's actively re-evaluating its stake in Rapido due to conflict of interest . 🔍 If I were in Swiggy’s shoes, here’s how I’d think: Assess core value vs conflict: Holding this stake might yield returns but at what cost to strategic focus? Explore redefined terms: Could a narrower collaboration still exist (e.g., mobility-only)? Prioritize operating profitability: With Instamart and #food #delivery burning #cash, reallocating resources may be necessary . 💬 My Take: Strategic investments aren’t just about financial returns they reinforce (or undermine) your core business. Swiggy now stands at a crossroads: Hold and hedge, redefine the partnership path, or exit to protect the legacy and future of its food delivery engine. What would you do if you were in Swiggy’s position exit the stake or hold tight? Share your insights. As someone who’s built business strategy around anticipating disruption, I’m keen to follow your thoughts. For more insights into startup dynamics and market strategy, let's connect and discuss! #StartupEcosystem #StrategicInvesting #FoodDeliveryWar #BusinessStrategy #SwiggyRapido #LinkedIn
20
-
Madhav Chanchani
The Arc • 26K followers
PhonePe is now targeting a valuation of $9-10.5 bn for its IPO, according to Reuters. This would represent up to a 25% discount to its last primary valuation of $12 bn, and about 40% below the reported target valuation of $15 bn. It is also closer to Paytm’s market capitalisation, which has hovered mostly between $8-10 bn over the past few months. It has now come down to $7.3 bn following the recent market crash. Both companies now have similar revenues, though Paytm has reported higher profits. With the valuation cut, it will be interesting to see if PhonePe can avoid the curse of decacorn IPOs. Paytm, which was listed in 2021, still trades about 50% below its IPO price. Swiggy, listed in 2024, currently trades around 25% below its IPO price and 21% below its QIP price. #payments #ipo #digital #UPI #phonepe #paytm #walmart #fintech
45
-
The CEO Magazine - India
20K followers
SaaS-based flex workspace aggregator Stylework has raised Rs 30 crore ($3.39M) in a pre-Series B round led by Equentis Angel Fund at a pre-money valuation of Rs 250 crore ($28.5M). The round also saw participation from Karekeba Ventures, LetsVenture Fund, MoneyVyapaar, and other existing investors. The funds will fuel its AI-driven SaaS marketplace, expansion into domestic and international markets, and leadership hires across product, business, and enterprise growth. Stylework connects enterprises with coworking and managed office operators across 125 cities, covering over 5,000 centres with 70,000+ seats sold. #stylework #flexworkspace #saasstartup #preseriesb #fundraisingnews #workspaceaggregation #coworking #managedoffices #startupfunding #growthstory #indiastartups #saasindia #digitalworkspace #enterprisegrowth #aiworkspace #workspaceanalytics #proptech #flexibleoffice #businessinnovation #scaleups
1
-
Jitin Nagpal
i3PO • 2K followers
𝗞𝗮𝗰𝗵𝗮 𝗥𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗮 𝗣𝗮𝗸𝗸𝗮 𝗥𝗮𝘀𝘁𝗮 𝗔𝗿𝗷𝘂𝗻: B2B product management is like driving on Noida’s smooth roads, yaar. Customers sign annual contracts. Retention is almost guaranteed for a year. Game simple hai: keep delivering value, beat the market. B2C type AARRR ki chinta nahin. 𝗗𝗲𝗲𝗽𝗮: Simple kyun lagta hai? Because contracts buy you time, not loyalty. Renewals feel easier only because procurement cycles are slow. The why is inertia - companies hate switching once they’ve sunk time and effort. But the moment value delivery slips, inertia breaks. Renewal is re-acquisition. 𝗡𝗶𝗸𝗵𝗶𝗹: Also consider this: decision makers buy a vision, but users live the daily reality. Agar activation fail ho gaya, executives feel the gap. That’s why adoption in month one can decide retention a year later. Imagine rolling out Slack in your firm but employees continue using WhatsApp. 𝗔𝗿𝗷𝘂𝗻: Hmm. Referrals though? Not explicit like B2C. No viral loops. 𝗗𝗲𝗲𝗽𝗮: Because B2B purchases carry personal risk. No one wants to say ‘I invited this tool’ and then take the blame if it fails. Referrals are quieter - a VP who trusts you takes you along to their next company. That’s why they’re subtle, private, but powerful. 𝗡𝗶𝗸𝗵𝗶𝗹 (𝗻𝗼𝗱𝗱𝗶𝗻𝗴, 𝗽𝘂𝗹𝗹𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗿𝗲𝗮𝗱𝘀 𝘁𝗼𝗴𝗲𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗿): Exactly. So you can’t deny the AARRR funnel for B2B businesses. Acquisition, Activation, Retention, Referral, Revenue - sab hai. Bas the why behind the weights is different. Acquisition skews sales-driven because careers and reputations are on the line. Referrals flow through exec networks because risk is personal. And PMs? We’re held most accountable for Activation and Retention, because those are the stages where product experience alone decides success. Mange it well and you’re on Noida’s roads. Don’t and you’re on the ones in Gurgaon on a rainy day.
33
1 Comment -
Naresh Purohit 🇮🇳
Veloxcore Pvt Ltd • 7K followers
Lenskart’s 70,000 Cr IPO: Growth Story or Overvaluation Risk? 👓 Lenskart.com is finally going public, and the number that’s getting everyone’s attention is its 70,000 crore valuation with a P/E of 235. For comparison, NVIDIA, the global leader behind the AI boom, trades at a P/E of about 60. So naturally, the question is, how does an eyewear company in India deserve a higher valuation than one of the fastest-growing tech giants in the world? Lenskart plans to raise around 7,200 crore through this IPO, but only 2,100 crore will go to the company. The remaining 5,100 crore will go to existing investors such as SoftBank, TPG, and Premji Invest, who are selling their shares. So, when new investors buy shares, a big part of their money isn’t going into Lenskart’s growth, it’s going to old investors cashing out. Now, there’s no doubt that Lenskart has built a solid business. It’s India’s biggest eyewear brand, designing, manufacturing, and selling its own products. The company operates over 2,500 stores in India and has expanded to markets like the UAE, Singapore, Japan, and the US. It's a fully integrated model that helps maintain quality and margins. Financially, the company’s numbers look good on paper. In FY25, it reported a revenue of 6,652 crore, up from 5,427 crore the previous year. It also turned a profit of 297 crore after a small loss of 10 crore in FY24. However, about 167 crore of this profit came from one-time income, meaning the actual business profit is lower. A few months ago, Peyush Bansal bought 4.27 crore shares from existing investors at an average price of 52 per share. Now, the IPO is valuing those shares at around 510, almost 10 times higher. While it’s common for founders to buy shares before an IPO, the large gap has raised questions about fairness for retail investors. Peyush Bansal has said the valuation is based on future potential, not current profits, and that might be true. India has nearly 500 million people who need corrective eyewear, but only a small part actually owns one. The growth opportunity is huge. So yes, it’s a well-built business with a long runway ahead. But paying 235x earnings still feels like a stretch. To me, the real question is : Is Lenskart’s IPO a sign of how far Indian startups have come? Or are we looking at another overvalued story, like what happened with Paytm? What’s your take? Would you invest in Lenskart at this price? 👇 LinkedIn LinkedIn for Marketing LinkedIn News India LinkedIn Guide to Networking LinkedIn News
62
Explore collaborative articles
We’re unlocking community knowledge in a new way. Experts add insights directly into each article, started with the help of AI.
Explore MoreOthers named Sumit Mendiratta
-
Sumit Mendiratta
Delhi, India -
Sumit Mendiratta
South Delhi -
Sumit Mendiratta
Sutton -
Sumit Mendiratta
Gurugram
25 others named Sumit Mendiratta are on LinkedIn
See others named Sumit Mendiratta