Researchers at Hong Kong University MaRS Lab have just published another jaw dropping paper featuring their safety-assured high-speed aerial robot path planning system dubbed "SUPER". With a single MID360 lidar sensor they repeatedly achieved autonomous one-shot navigation at speeds exceeding 20m/s in obstacle rich environments. Since it only requires a single lidar these vehicles can be built with a small footprint and navigate completely independent of light, GPS and radio link. This is not just #SLAM on a #drone, in fact the SUPER system continuously computes two trajectories in each re-planning cycleโa high-speed exploratory trajectory and a conservative backup trajectory. The exploratory trajectory is designed to maximize speed by considering both known free spaces and unknown areas, allowing the drone to fly aggressively and efficiently toward its goal. In contrast, the backup trajectory is entirely confined within the known free spaces identified by the point-cloud map, ensuring that if unforeseen obstacles are encountered or if the systemโs perception becomes uncertain, the system can safely switch to a precomputed, collision-free path. The direct use of LIDAR point clouds for mapping eliminates the need for time-consuming occupancy grid updates and complex data fusion algorithms. Combined with an efficient dual-trajectory planning framework, this leads to significant reductions in computation timeโoften an order of magnitude faster than comparable SLAM-based systemsโallowing the MAV to operate at higher speeds without sacrificing safety. This two-pronged planning strategy is particularly innovative because it directly addresses the classic speed-safety trade-off in autonomous navigation. By planning an exploratory trajectory that pushes the speed envelope and a backup trajectory that guarantees safety, SUPER can achieve high-speed flight (demonstrated speeds exceeding 20 meters per second) without compromising on collision avoidance. If you've been tracking the progress of autonomy in aerial robotics and matching it to the winning strategies emerging in Ukraine, it's clear we're likely to experience another ChatGPT moment in this domain, very soon. #LiDAR scanners will continue to get smaller and cheaper, solid state VSCEL based sensors are rapidly improving and it is conceivable that vehicles with this capability can be built and deployed with a bill of materials below $1000. Link to the paper in the comments below.
Engineering Simulation Tools Overview
Explore top LinkedIn content from expert professionals.
-
-
Very glad to share our latest work -- first paper in LES of offshore wind farms -- on "Evaluation of Six Subgrid-Scale Models for LES of Wind Farms in Stable and Conventionally-Neutral Atmospheric Stratification" https://lnkd.in/dwMBS_am. As far as we know, it is the first time such a comprehensive comparison of 6 sgs models has been done within a single LES code, looking at wind farm wakes. The key goal is to investigate how these perform in stable thermal stratification as we know wind farm wakes extend the longest under such conditions. In addition, how sensitive is the sgs model to the grid size, i.e. can we obtain a good solution of the flow physics at a relatively coarse grid? Details are on the preprint but we've seen the Anisotropic Minimum-Dissipation model is working best. Excellent work led by a brillian PhD student Mina Naem co-supevised with Tim Stallard and David Schultz. LES ran on #ARCHER2 thanks to #UKTC support. EPSRC, Supergen Offshore Renewable Energy (ORE) Hub
-
๐บ๏ธ๐ง๐ต๐ถ๐ ๐ถ๐ ๐๐ต๐ ๐ถ๐'๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ผ ๐ฏ๐ฒ ๐ฎ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ ๐๐ผ ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐น๐ ๐๐๐ถ๐๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ณ๐น๐ผ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐น๐.๐บ๏ธ WAsP? CFD? VORTEX? GWA? Mesoscale? Downscaled? Ensembled? Calibrated? It is never true that one wind flow model is "right" and all others are "wrong". ๐๐น๐น ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฝ๐ ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ท๐๐๐ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ด๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ด ๐ถ๐ป ๐ฑ๐ถ๐ณ๐ณ๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ป๐ ๐ฝ๐น๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐. It's your job as a wind engineer to interpret the opinions they provide. There's a ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ and a ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ to decide which modelling approach is "best" ("least terrible"). โข โ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐๐ฟ๐ผ๐ป๐ด ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ?โ Before you've looked at the results of each model. โข โ ๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ด๐ต๐ ๐๐ถ๐บ๐ฒ?โ After you've calculated the yield from each model. ย โน๏ธHere are Wind Pioneers top tips for how you should go about selecting a wind flow model(s)โน๏ธ 1. ๐ฅ๐๐ป ๐ฎ๐น๐น ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ ๐น๐ฎ๐๐ผ๐๐๐/configurations using each wind flow model 2. ๐๐ผ๐บ๐ฝ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ผ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐น๐น ๐ป๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ฒ๐น๐ฑ of the wind farm with the different models to understand how consequential your choice is. 3. ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ณ๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐๐ฎ๐น ๐ช๐ง๐๐ where the choice of model is having the biggest impact on yield. 4. ๐๐๐ธ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ณ ๐๐ต๐. Is it because one model handles complex terrain differently? Is one model picking up mesoscale effects that another isn't? Has one model been overfitted to measurements? Has your CFD failed to converge? 5. ๐๐๐ธ ๐๐ผ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ณ ๐ต๐ผ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐๐ผ๐น๐๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฏ๐น๐ฒ๐บ ๐๐ถ๐๐ต๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฎ๐ป๐ผ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ. Can you calibrate the maps to the measurements differently? Can you downscale a microscale model from a mesosacle model? Can you blend maps? ๐ฒ. ๐๐ผ๐ป๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ณ๐๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ. Do your results need to align with what an independent yield consultant will produce in a few months? Will new measurements change your decision? Is your choice of wind map something you might regret later? (E.g. undervaluing an area of the site) ๐ณ. ๐ฅ๐ฒ๐ฝ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ต๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฒ๐๐. Whenever there's a significant change to the layouts or available measurements. Lastly, remember one key point: โ๐๐ป๐น๐ฒ๐๐ ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ฝ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฐ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐น๐ ๐บ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐๐๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ฎ ๐น๐ผ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ผ๐ ๐ต๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐ป๐ผ ๐๐ฎ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ธ๐ป๐ผ๐ ๐๐ต๐ถ๐ฐ๐ต ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ฑ ๐บ๐ฎ๐ฝ ๐ถ๐ ๐บ๐ผ๐๐ ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฐ๐๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ ๐๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒโCross-verification between two measurement locations does not guarantee extrapolative accuracy to dozens of WTG locations. If you need advice on wind modelling approaches for your site - come talk to us!
-
Today's a great day! I just completed my experiment on Performance Assessment of Micro Wind Energy Generator! This project was a thrilling journey of understanding the efficiency and potential of micro wind turbines in generating renewable energy. To create an experiment on the *performance assessment of a micro wind energy generator* using Simulink, we can follow a simple step-by-step guide to model the system. Below is an overview of the basic components needed in Simulink and how they are structured for performance assessment: *Understanding the System:* A *micro wind energy generator* typically consists of a wind turbine, a generator (like a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator - PMSG), and a load or grid connection. We will assess the systemโs performance by measuring the power generated under different wind speeds. *Components in Simulink:* - *Wind Turbine Block:* This simulates the mechanical power generated from wind. It depends on wind speed, air density, rotor area, and the turbineโs power coefficient. - *Generator Block (PMSG):* Converts the mechanical power to electrical power. This can be modeled using a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator. - *Controller Block :* If you want to control the turbineโs speed or power output. - *Load/Scope:* To measure the electrical output (voltage, current, power). The Model Generator - Use a *Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator (PMSG)* block to simulate the electrical generation from the mechanical torque input from the wind turbine. - The mechanical input (torque and speed) comes from the turbine, and the electrical output is connected to the load. *Simulating the System:* - After building the model, run simulations at different wind speeds (for example, 5 m/s, 10 m/s, and 15 m/s) to observe how the power output changes. - Compare the electrical power output at various speeds and observe the system's efficiency. This simple model gives insight into the performance of a micro wind energy generator and helps analyze key metrics like power output and system efficiency under varying conditions. #MicroWindEnergy #RenewableEnergy #ExperimentComplete #InnovationJourney
-
๐๐จ๐ ๐๐ก๐ข๐๐ ๐ฅ๐ข๐๐ข๐ง๐๐๐ฆ: ๐ช๐ต๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ฆ๐ถ๐บ๐๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ฒ๐ด๐ถ๐ป๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ฟ๐ป๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐๐๐ฎ๐ธ๐ฒ๐ป๐ Deep Learning in 3D Simulation is not a lab exercise. It is the moment we begin to teach machines how to exist. Not to repeat motions. Not to merely follow code. But to learn, adapt, balance, reason, and act with purpose. In my project we are not just building robots. We are building a new class of intelligence that experiences the world before it ever touches reality. In these simulation environments, gravity does not remain constant. Terrain does not always cooperate. Obstacles change shape. Sensors lie. Friction shifts. And the humanoid must still stand, walk, grasp, adjust, optimize, and choose its next step. Domain randomization, reinforcement learning, hierarchical policies, and graph neural dependencies no longer sound like academic theory. They become survival tools. Machines begin to develop strategies. They learn how to carry payloads across unstable rubble. They learn energy discipline when battery is low and temperature is high. They learn trajectory planning not as geometry, but as survival logic. When you combine photorealistic environments from Isaac Sim, contact-perfect physics in MuJoCo, embodied navigation in Habitat, and emergent behavior in Unity, you begin to see something different. You see machines build experience. You see memory. You see policy retention. You see adaptation. You see the beginning of abstract perception where simulation is not just testing, but education. The difference between teaching a robot how to walk, and letting it discover how to navigate a collapsing environment with intelligence and intent. This is where humanoid robotics becomes human oriented. Robots that can open doors without templates. Carry supplies without pre-programmed routes. Coordinate convoys. Assist in evacuation. Make real time physical decisions aligned with mission objectives, not static instructions. Simulation gives us time compression. We can give a single humanoid what would have taken humans years of trial. We can compress thousands of failures into one informed policy. This is how we transform capability. Not automation. Cognitive autonomy. Not motion planning. Motion intelligence. Not digital twins. Learning twins. We are building humanoids that do not just survive the environment. They learn from it. If you are in advanced simulation, deep learning pipelines, physics engines, reinforcement learning, biomechanics, embodied cognition, ROS2, Isaac Sim, MuJoCo, Omniverse, Habitat, Unity, Unreal, LLM integration, perception or policy optimizationโฆ Then we should not be working apart. We should be building this together. And for those ready to build the next generation of thinking humanoids Singularity Systems is now accepting collaborators, researchers, engineers, architects, and visionaries. Letโs teach machines how to exist. #changetheworld #3D #unity
-
๐๐๏ธ๐ค๐ I share this paper about a Hardware-in-the-Loop (#HiL) simulation framework ๐๏ธ for Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (#UAV) to validate ๐ฏ the simulation models and the performance of #autonomous algorithms ๐บ๏ธ under realistic #flight conditions ๐ง๏ธ. With #digitaltwins ๐จโฑ๏ธ in #Simcenter #Amesim and #Simcenter #Prescan (combined). ๐ฐ https://lnkd.in/e-jYB9Wv ๐ Some extracts: โA real-time simulation of both manual and autonomous flights is completed by coupling the modelled aircraft subsystems and sensors in Simcenter Amesim and Simcenter Prescan with a Pixhawk flight controller.โ โSensor information (position, acceleration and GPS location) coming from the Amesim model, are fed to the flight controller which computes the necessary motor throttle to navigate the UAV according to the desired trajectory.โ โThe manual flight takes place in the Toulouse environment where a flight path was flown and recorded.โ โThe autonomous flight simulation was performed in a section of the City of London.โ โ๏ธ Some outcomes: โThe simulation with light rain corresponds quite accurately with the ground truth (excluding the corners and the back-and-forth movement in the first stretch).โ โThe setup shows great promise as an initial step towards safely testing localization algorithms and flight controllers in various scenarios and conditions.โ โSuccessfully operating a real flight controller in a simulated environment is a significant achievement.โ ๐ Itโs always nice to see synergies between Siemens products to go some steps further in the analysis. The research presented in this paper has been supported by the MARLOC research project and has received funding from the Flemish government through the VLAIO ICON Program. #Simcenter #SystemSimulation #Amesim #Prescan #drone #quadcopter #aerospace #uam #uav #flightmissions #dronedelivery #autonomoussystems #controls #realtime #cosimulation #flightcontroller #vSLAM #digitaltwin #EngineerInnovation
-
๐ What if drones could think? Not pre-programmed โ but react live to their surroundings. This week, I explored that exact question โ not in theory, but in code. ๐ง My self-learning journey is focused on agentic AI workflows: how can autonomous agents ingest live data, reason about the world, and act in real time? So I set out to simulate it. Using Kafka, Zookeeper, OpenAI, and Docker, I used ai to build a minimal system that lets an AI agent take control โ moment by moment. ๐ฎ The experiment: I created a real-time game where a drone dodges falling obstacles. Instead of writing the rules myself, I stream the live game state into an AI agent โ and let it decide what the drone should do next. ๐ก The agent reads: The droneโs position The location and size of every falling object A pre-processed danger zone Then chooses: "left", "right", or "stay" โ every 500ms. ๐งฑ The architecture (see image): Zookeeper โ Keeps Kafka's coordination intact Kafka โ Streams telemetry data in real time Backend โ Exposes API endpoints for state + decisions Frontend โ A browser-based canvas simulating the drone Agent โ Uses OpenAI to analyze the stream and return actions Everything is Dockerized. One command launches the entire swarm. ๐ฏ Why does this matter? Because real drones fly through uncertain environments. Theyโll need to react โ not just follow rules. This setup is my stepping stone toward: Swarm AI control Agent-based FPV drones Adaptive automation in physical systems And Iโm documenting every bit. โ ๐ ๏ธ Built in ~24 hours ๐ธ Image shows my full-stack agent infrastructure ๐ง Goal: Learn how autonomous feedback loops actually run โ ๐ฐ I write about this journey โ AI, drones, 3D printing, and how it all connects: ๐ https://lnkd.in/gzUhhVjj #AI #Drones #Kafka #Zookeeper #OpenAI #AgenticWorkflows #RealTimeAI #EdgeAI #Docker #LLMops #AutonomousSystems #STEM #FlightClub #OpenSource #DevInfra
-
Release of Genesis represents something extraordinary. After diving deep into the research paper, I want to share why this isn't just another AI tool - it's potentially the bridge to making personal robots a reality. What is Genesis?ย Imagine having a "virtual universe" where robots can practice tasks millions of times in minutes, learning from each experience, all before attempting anything in the real world. That's Genesis - but it's even more fascinating than that. ๐ The Traditional vs Genesis Approach Let me share a simple example that blew my mind: Teaching a robot to pour water traditionally: - Program every movement manually - Test with real water (risking robot damage) - Repeat thousands of times - Limited to specific cups and situations learned With Genesis: Simply tell it: "Pour water from a pitcher into a cup without spilling" Genesis automatically: - Tests different cup sizes and shapes - Varies water amounts and conditions - Adjusts for different surfaces - Completes millions of practice runs in hours And here's the kicker - it runs 430,000 times faster than real-time! What would take a year to learn traditionally can be learned in 45 seconds. ๐คฏ ๐ฎ Four Game-Changing Components: 1. Universal Physics Engine - Simulates at 43 million frames per second - 430,000x faster than real-time operation - Accurate physics for multiple material types in one simulation 2. Ultra-Fast Robotics Platform - Processes 1 year of training in 45 seconds - Enables parallel testing of thousands of scenarios 3. Photo-Realistic Rendering - Real-time physics-based rendering - Accurate material and lighting simulation 4. Natural Language Understanding - Converts plain English to robot commands - Handles complex multi-step instructions ๐ก Why This Matters: Think about how we currently develop robots - it's like teaching someone to swim without water. Genesis changes this by creating a perfect practice environment where: - Engineers can test wild ideas without physical prototyping - Robots can learn complex tasks through millions of attempts ๐ Beyond Robotics - Universal Applications: Genesis isn't just for robotics - it's transforming multiple fields: - Healthcare: Medical robots practicing surgical procedures millions of times before touching a patient - Architecture: Building design and structural analysis - Entertainment: Physics-accurate animations and VR - Education: Interactive learning environments - Manufacturing: Manufacturing robots reconfiguring for new tasks through simple instructions ๐ฎ Future Vision: Imagine describing a task to your home robot in plain language, and it understanding exactly what to do because it's already practiced similar scenarios millions of times in simulation. That future just got much closer. #AI #Robotics #Innovation #TechnologyInnovation #FutureOfWork #ArtificialIntelligence #RoboticAutomation
-
Big shift in robotics: NVIDIA just open-sourcedย Isaac Simย andย Isaac Lab. Isaac Sim has already been a cornerstone for high-fidelity robotics simulationโRTX-accelerated physics, realistic lidar/camera simulation, domain randomization, ROS/URDF support, and synthetic data pipelines. Now, itโs all on GitHub with full source access. But the real multiplier? The release ofย Isaac Labโa modular, open reinforcement learning and robot control framework built directly on top of Isaac Sim. It comes with ready-to-use robots (Franka, UR5, ANYmal), training loops, and environments for manipulation, locomotion, and more. Whatโs different now: *Youโre no longer limited to APIsโdevelopers can modify physics, sensors, and control logic at the source level. *Isaac Lab provides aย training-readyย foundation for sim-to-real robotics, speeding up learning pipelines dramatically. *Debugging, benchmarking, and custom integrations are now transparent, flexible, and community-driven. *Collaboration across research and industry just got easierโwith reproducible environments, tasks, and results. Weโve used Isaac Sim extensively, and this open-source release is going to accelerate innovation across the robotics community. GitHub:ย https://lnkd.in/gcyP9F4H
Explore categories
- Hospitality & Tourism
- Productivity
- Finance
- Soft Skills & Emotional Intelligence
- Project Management
- Education
- Technology
- Leadership
- Ecommerce
- User Experience
- Recruitment & HR
- Customer Experience
- Real Estate
- Marketing
- Sales
- Retail & Merchandising
- Science
- Supply Chain Management
- Future Of Work
- Consulting
- Writing
- Economics
- Artificial Intelligence
- Employee Experience
- Healthcare
- Workplace Trends
- Fundraising
- Networking
- Corporate Social Responsibility
- Negotiation
- Communication
- Career
- Business Strategy
- Change Management
- Organizational Culture
- Design
- Innovation
- Event Planning
- Training & Development

