Prompt caching

Prompt caching is a powerful feature that optimizes your API usage by allowing resuming from specific prefixes in your prompts. This approach significantly reduces processing time and costs for repetitive tasks or prompts with consistent elements.

Here's an example of how to implement prompt caching with the Messages API using a cache_control block:

curl https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages \
  -H "content-type: application/json" \
  -H "x-api-key: $ANTHROPIC_API_KEY" \
  -H "anthropic-version: 2023-06-01" \
  -d '{
    "model": "claude-sonnet-4-5",
    "max_tokens": 1024,
    "system": [
      {
        "type": "text",
        "text": "You are an AI assistant tasked with analyzing literary works. Your goal is to provide insightful commentary on themes, characters, and writing style.\n"
      },
      {
        "type": "text",
        "text": "<the entire contents of Pride and Prejudice>",
        "cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"}
      }
    ],
    "messages": [
      {
        "role": "user",
        "content": "Analyze the major themes in Pride and Prejudice."
      }
    ]
  }'

# Call the model again with the same inputs up to the cache checkpoint
curl https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages # rest of input

{"cache_creation_input_tokens":188086,"cache_read_input_tokens":0,"input_tokens":21,"output_tokens":393}
{"cache_creation_input_tokens":0,"cache_read_input_tokens":188086,"input_tokens":21,"output_tokens":393}

In this example, the entire text of "Pride and Prejudice" is cached using the cache_control parameter. This enables reuse of this large text across multiple API calls without reprocessing it each time. Changing only the user message allows you to ask various questions about the book while utilizing the cached content, leading to faster responses and improved efficiency.

How prompt caching works

When you send a request with prompt caching enabled:

1. The system checks if a prompt prefix, up to a specified cache breakpoint, is already cached from a recent query.
2. If found, it uses the cached version, reducing processing time and costs.
3. Otherwise, it processes the full prompt and caches the prefix once the response begins.

This is especially useful for:

• Prompts with many examples
• Large amounts of context or background information
• Repetitive tasks with consistent instructions
• Long multi-turn conversations

By default, the cache has a 5-minute lifetime. The cache is refreshed for no additional cost each time the cached content is used.

Pricing

Prompt caching introduces a new pricing structure. The table below shows the price per million tokens for each supported model:

How to implement prompt caching

Supported models

Prompt caching is currently supported on:

• Claude Opus 4.5
• Claude Opus 4.1
• Claude Opus 4
• Claude Sonnet 4.5
• Claude Sonnet 4
• Claude Sonnet 3.7 (deprecated)
• Claude Haiku 4.5
• Claude Haiku 3.5 (deprecated)
• Claude Haiku 3

Structuring your prompt

Place static content (tool definitions, system instructions, context, examples) at the beginning of your prompt. Mark the end of the reusable content for caching using the cache_control parameter.

Cache prefixes are created in the following order: tools, system, then messages. This order forms a hierarchy where each level builds upon the previous ones.

How automatic prefix checking works

You can use just one cache breakpoint at the end of your static content, and the system will automatically find the longest matching sequence of cached blocks. Understanding how this works helps you optimize your caching strategy.

Three core principles:

1. Cache keys are cumulative: When you explicitly cache a block with cache_control, the cache hash key is generated by hashing all previous blocks in the conversation sequentially. This means the cache for each block depends on all content that came before it.

2. Backward sequential checking: The system checks for cache hits by working backwards from your explicit breakpoint, checking each previous block in reverse order. This ensures you get the longest possible cache hit.

3. 20-block lookback window: The system only checks up to 20 blocks before each explicit cache_control breakpoint. After checking 20 blocks without a match, it stops checking and moves to the next explicit breakpoint (if any).

Example: Understanding the lookback window

Consider a conversation with 30 content blocks where you set cache_control only on block 30:

• If you send block 31 with no changes to previous blocks: The system checks block 30 (match!). You get a cache hit at block 30, and only block 31 needs processing.

• If you modify block 25 and send block 31: The system checks backwards from block 30 → 29 → 28... → 25 (no match) → 24 (match!). Since block 24 hasn't changed, you get a cache hit at block 24, and only blocks 25-30 need reprocessing.

• If you modify block 5 and send block 31: The system checks backwards from block 30 → 29 → 28... → 11 (check #20). After 20 checks without finding a match, it stops looking. Since block 5 is beyond the 20-block window, no cache hit occurs and all blocks need reprocessing. However, if you had set an explicit cache_control breakpoint on block 5, the system would continue checking from that breakpoint: block 5 (no match) → block 4 (match!). This allows a cache hit at block 4, demonstrating why you should place breakpoints before editable content.

Key takeaway: Always set an explicit cache breakpoint at the end of your conversation to maximize your chances of cache hits. Additionally, set breakpoints just before content blocks that might be editable to ensure those sections can be cached independently.

When to use multiple breakpoints

You can define up to 4 cache breakpoints if you want to:

• Cache different sections that change at different frequencies (e.g., tools rarely change, but context updates daily)
• Have more control over exactly what gets cached
• Ensure caching for content more than 20 blocks before your final breakpoint
• Place breakpoints before editable content to guarantee cache hits even when changes occur beyond the 20-block window

Cache limitations

The minimum cacheable prompt length is:

• 4096 tokens for Claude Opus 4.5
• 1024 tokens for Claude Opus 4.1, Claude Opus 4, Claude Sonnet 4.5, Claude Sonnet 4, and Claude Sonnet 3.7 (deprecated)
• 4096 tokens for Claude Haiku 4.5
• 2048 tokens for Claude Haiku 3.5 (deprecated) and Claude Haiku 3

Shorter prompts cannot be cached, even if marked with cache_control. Any requests to cache fewer than this number of tokens will be processed without caching. To see if a prompt was cached, see the response usage fields.

For concurrent requests, note that a cache entry only becomes available after the first response begins. If you need cache hits for parallel requests, wait for the first response before sending subsequent requests.

Currently, "ephemeral" is the only supported cache type, which by default has a 5-minute lifetime.

Understanding cache breakpoint costs

Cache breakpoints themselves don't add any cost. You are only charged for:

• Cache writes: When new content is written to the cache (25% more than base input tokens for 5-minute TTL)
• Cache reads: When cached content is used (10% of base input token price)
• Regular input tokens: For any uncached content

Adding more cache_control breakpoints doesn't increase your costs - you still pay the same amount based on what content is actually cached and read. The breakpoints simply give you control over what sections can be cached independently.

What can be cached

Most blocks in the request can be designated for caching with cache_control. This includes:

• Tools: Tool definitions in the tools array
• System messages: Content blocks in the system array
• Text messages: Content blocks in the messages.content array, for both user and assistant turns
• Images & Documents: Content blocks in the messages.content array, in user turns
• Tool use and tool results: Content blocks in the messages.content array, in both user and assistant turns

Each of these elements can be marked with cache_control to enable caching for that portion of the request.

What cannot be cached

While most request blocks can be cached, there are some exceptions:

• Thinking blocks cannot be cached directly with cache_control. However, thinking blocks CAN be cached alongside other content when they appear in previous assistant turns. When cached this way, they DO count as input tokens when read from cache.

• Sub-content blocks (like citations) themselves cannot be cached directly. Instead, cache the top-level block.

  In the case of citations, the top-level document content blocks that serve as the source material for citations can be cached. This allows you to use prompt caching with citations effectively by caching the documents that citations will reference.

• Empty text blocks cannot be cached.

What invalidates the cache

Modifications to cached content can invalidate some or all of the cache.

As described in Structuring your prompt, the cache follows the hierarchy: tools → system → messages. Changes at each level invalidate that level and all subsequent levels.

The following table shows which parts of the cache are invalidated by different types of changes. ✘ indicates that the cache is invalidated, while ✓ indicates that the cache remains valid.

Tracking cache performance

Monitor cache performance using these API response fields, within usage in the response (or message_start event if streaming):

• cache_creation_input_tokens: Number of tokens written to the cache when creating a new entry.
• cache_read_input_tokens: Number of tokens retrieved from the cache for this request.
• input_tokens: Number of input tokens which were not read from or used to create a cache (i.e., tokens after the last cache breakpoint).

total_input_tokens = cache_read_input_tokens + cache_creation_input_tokens + input_tokens

Best practices for effective caching

To optimize prompt caching performance:

• Cache stable, reusable content like system instructions, background information, large contexts, or frequent tool definitions.
• Place cached content at the prompt's beginning for best performance.
• Use cache breakpoints strategically to separate different cacheable prefix sections.
• Set cache breakpoints at the end of conversations and just before editable content to maximize cache hit rates, especially when working with prompts that have more than 20 content blocks.
• Regularly analyze cache hit rates and adjust your strategy as needed.

Optimizing for different use cases

Tailor your prompt caching strategy to your scenario:

• Conversational agents: Reduce cost and latency for extended conversations, especially those with long instructions or uploaded documents.
• Coding assistants: Improve autocomplete and codebase Q&A by keeping relevant sections or a summarized version of the codebase in the prompt.
• Large document processing: Incorporate complete long-form material including images in your prompt without increasing response latency.
• Detailed instruction sets: Share extensive lists of instructions, procedures, and examples to fine-tune Claude's responses. Developers often include an example or two in the prompt, but with prompt caching you can get even better performance by including 20+ diverse examples of high quality answers.
• Agentic tool use: Enhance performance for scenarios involving multiple tool calls and iterative code changes, where each step typically requires a new API call.
• Talk to books, papers, documentation, podcast transcripts, and other longform content: Bring any knowledge base alive by embedding the entire document(s) into the prompt, and letting users ask it questions.

Troubleshooting common issues

If experiencing unexpected behavior:

• Ensure cached sections are identical and marked with cache_control in the same locations across calls
• Check that calls are made within the cache lifetime (5 minutes by default)
• Verify that tool_choice and image usage remain consistent between calls
• Validate that you are caching at least the minimum number of tokens
• The system automatically checks for cache hits at previous content block boundaries (up to ~20 blocks before your breakpoint). For prompts with more than 20 content blocks, you may need additional cache_control parameters earlier in the prompt to ensure all content can be cached
• Verify that the keys in your tool_use content blocks have stable ordering as some languages (e.g. Swift, Go) randomize key order during JSON conversion, breaking caches

Caching with thinking blocks

When using extended thinking with prompt caching, thinking blocks have special behavior:

Automatic caching alongside other content: While thinking blocks cannot be explicitly marked with cache_control, they get cached as part of the request content when you make subsequent API calls with tool results. This commonly happens during tool use when you pass thinking blocks back to continue the conversation.

Input token counting: When thinking blocks are read from cache, they count as input tokens in your usage metrics. This is important for cost calculation and token budgeting.

Cache invalidation patterns:

• Cache remains valid when only tool results are provided as user messages
• Cache gets invalidated when non-tool-result user content is added, causing all previous thinking blocks to be stripped
• This caching behavior occurs even without explicit cache_control markers

For more details on cache invalidation, see What invalidates the cache.

Example with tool use:

Request 1: User: "What's the weather in Paris?"
Response: [thinking_block_1] + [tool_use block 1]

Request 2:
User: ["What's the weather in Paris?"],
Assistant: [thinking_block_1] + [tool_use block 1],
User: [tool_result_1, cache=True]
Response: [thinking_block_2] + [text block 2]
# Request 2 caches its request content (not the response)
# The cache includes: user message, thinking_block_1, tool_use block 1, and tool_result_1

Request 3:
User: ["What's the weather in Paris?"],
Assistant: [thinking_block_1] + [tool_use block 1],
User: [tool_result_1, cache=True],
Assistant: [thinking_block_2] + [text block 2],
User: [Text response, cache=True]
# Non-tool-result user block causes all thinking blocks to be ignored
# This request is processed as if thinking blocks were never present

When a non-tool-result user block is included, it designates a new assistant loop and all previous thinking blocks are removed from context.

For more detailed information, see the extended thinking documentation.

Cache storage and sharing

• Organization Isolation: Caches are isolated between organizations. Different organizations never share caches, even if they use identical prompts.

• Exact Matching: Cache hits require 100% identical prompt segments, including all text and images up to and including the block marked with cache control.

• Output Token Generation: Prompt caching has no effect on output token generation. The response you receive will be identical to what you would get if prompt caching was not used.

1-hour cache duration

If you find that 5 minutes is too short, Anthropic also offers a 1-hour cache duration at additional cost.

To use the extended cache, include ttl in the cache_control definition like this:

"cache_control": {
    "type": "ephemeral",
    "ttl": "5m" | "1h"
}

The response will include detailed cache information like the following:

{
    "usage": {
        "input_tokens": ...,
        "cache_read_input_tokens": ...,
        "cache_creation_input_tokens": ...,
        "output_tokens": ...,

        "cache_creation": {
            "ephemeral_5m_input_tokens": 456,
            "ephemeral_1h_input_tokens": 100,
        }
    }
}

Note that the current cache_creation_input_tokens field equals the sum of the values in the cache_creation object.

When to use the 1-hour cache

If you have prompts that are used at a regular cadence (i.e., system prompts that are used more frequently than every 5 minutes), continue to use the 5-minute cache, since this will continue to be refreshed at no additional charge.

The 1-hour cache is best used in the following scenarios:

• When you have prompts that are likely used less frequently than 5 minutes, but more frequently than every hour. For example, when an agentic side-agent will take longer than 5 minutes, or when storing a long chat conversation with a user and you generally expect that user may not respond in the next 5 minutes.
• When latency is important and your follow up prompts may be sent beyond 5 minutes.
• When you want to improve your rate limit utilization, since cache hits are not deducted against your rate limit.

Mixing different TTLs

You can use both 1-hour and 5-minute cache controls in the same request, but with an important constraint: Cache entries with longer TTL must appear before shorter TTLs (i.e., a 1-hour cache entry must appear before any 5-minute cache entries).

When mixing TTLs, we determine three billing locations in your prompt:

1. Position A: The token count at the highest cache hit (or 0 if no hits).
2. Position B: The token count at the highest 1-hour cache_control block after A (or equals A if none exist).
3. Position C: The token count at the last cache_control block.

You'll be charged for:

1. Cache read tokens for A.
2. 1-hour cache write tokens for (B - A).
3. 5-minute cache write tokens for (C - B).

Here are 3 examples. This depicts the input tokens of 3 requests, each of which has different cache hits and cache misses. Each has a different calculated pricing, shown in the colored boxes, as a result.

Prompt caching examples

To help you get started with prompt caching, we've prepared a prompt caching cookbook with detailed examples and best practices.

Below, we've included several code snippets that showcase various prompt caching patterns. These examples demonstrate how to implement caching in different scenarios, helping you understand the practical applications of this feature:

FAQ