Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
- PMID: 29985107
- DOI: 10.1177/0146167218783192
Cognitive Reflection and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
Abstract
We present a large exploratory study ( N = 15,001) investigating the relationship between cognitive reflection and political affiliation, ideology, and voting in the 2016 Presidential Election. We find that Trump voters are less reflective than Clinton voters or third-party voters. However, much (although not all) of this difference was driven by Democrats who chose Trump. Among Republicans, conversely, Clinton and Trump voters were similar, whereas third-party voters were more reflective. Furthermore, although Democrats/liberals were somewhat more reflective than Republicans/conservatives overall, political moderates and nonvoters were least reflective, whereas libertarians were most reflective. Thus, beyond the previously theorized correlation between analytic thinking and liberalism, these data suggest three additional consequences of reflectiveness (or lack thereof) for political cognition: (a) facilitating political apathy versus engagement, (b) supporting the adoption of orthodoxy versus heterodoxy, and (c) drawing individuals toward candidates who share their cognitive style and toward policy proposals that are intuitively compelling.
Keywords: 2016 election; cognitive reflection; dual process theory; intuition; political ideology.
Similar articles
-
Toward a Developmental Science of Politics.Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019 Sep;84(3):7-185. doi: 10.1111/mono.12410. Monogr Soc Res Child Dev. 2019. PMID: 31503346
-
Speaking two "Languages" in America: A semantic space analysis of how presidential candidates and their supporters represent abstract political concepts differently.Behav Res Methods. 2017 Oct;49(5):1668-1685. doi: 10.3758/s13428-017-0931-5. Behav Res Methods. 2017. PMID: 28718087
-
Political Ideology, Trust, and Cooperation: In-group Favoritism among Republicans and Democrats during a US National Election.J Conflict Resolut. 2018 Apr;62(4):797-818. doi: 10.1177/0022002716658694. Epub 2016 Jul 21. J Conflict Resolut. 2018. PMID: 29593363 Free PMC article.
-
Collective nostalgia and political ideology.Curr Opin Psychol. 2023 Aug;52:101607. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2023.101607. Epub 2023 May 27. Curr Opin Psychol. 2023. PMID: 37336057 Review.
-
False polarization: Cognitive mechanisms and potential solutions.Curr Opin Psychol. 2022 Feb;43:1-6. doi: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.06.005. Epub 2021 Jun 17. Curr Opin Psychol. 2022. PMID: 34256246 Review.
Cited by
-
The role of defense styles and psychopathological symptoms on adherence to conspiracy theories during the COVID-19 pandemic.Sci Rep. 2023 Mar 1;13(1):3482. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-30531-0. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 36859511 Free PMC article.
-
Fighting misinformation on social media using crowdsourced judgments of news source quality.Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Feb 12;116(7):2521-2526. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1806781116. Epub 2019 Jan 28. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019. PMID: 30692252 Free PMC article.
-
Insight Problem Solving Ability Predicts Reduced Susceptibility to Fake News, Bullshit, and Overclaiming.Think Reason. 2023;29(4):760-784. doi: 10.1080/13546783.2022.2146191. Epub 2022 Nov 25. Think Reason. 2023. PMID: 37982007 Free PMC article.
-
The relation between authoritarian leadership and belief in fake news.Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 8;13(1):12860. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39807-x. Sci Rep. 2023. PMID: 37553407 Free PMC article.
-
Information battleground: Conflict perceptions motivate the belief in and sharing of misinformation about the adversary.PLoS One. 2023 Mar 22;18(3):e0282308. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0282308. eCollection 2023. PLoS One. 2023. PMID: 36947501 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources

Formed in 2009, the Archive Team (not to be confused with the archive.org Archive-It Team) is a rogue archivist collective dedicated to saving copies of rapidly dying or deleted websites for the sake of history and digital heritage. The group is 100% composed of volunteers and interested parties, and has expanded into a large amount of related projects for saving online and digital history.

