Nouveau Labs’ cover photo
Nouveau Labs

Nouveau Labs

IT Services and IT Consulting

Bengaluru, Karnataka 6,521 followers

Thinking beyond

About us

Nouveau Labs Pvt. Ltd. is a Product Platform and SW Engineering services and technology company with its HQ in Bangalore and Sales & Marketing office in San Jose. The company has its executive leadership represented by industry veterans with a deep background in software engineering and sales. The company aims to be the most innovative & trusted product development & support partner for global technology companies and start-ups working on digital products or platforms. The core business of the company is to provide world-class experience & out-of-the-box solutions around product engineering services while leveraging its technology expertise around Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Analytics, Automation, Robotics, Cloud, Wireless, and Unified Communications, Embedded Systems, Mobility etc. The company is also creating platforms and solutions to help clients accelerate their product development. The company adopts best of the people policies while recruiting superior technical & managerial minds from the industry. We believe in long-term commitment to its stakeholders so that we work in a family-like environment with passion, transparency and commitment.

Website
http://www.nouveau-labs.com/
Industry
IT Services and IT Consulting
Company size
51-200 employees
Headquarters
Bengaluru, Karnataka
Type
Privately Held
Founded
2017
Specialties
Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, Analytics, Automation, Robotics, Cloud, Wireless, Data Warehousing, Security, Unified Communications, and Multimedia Communications

Locations

  • Primary

    GINSERV, JSS Campus

    Behind Leela Palace, Kodihalli

    Bengaluru, Karnataka 560008, IN

    Get directions
  • Nouveau Labs INC

    1630 Wheatley Pl.

    San Jose, CA 95121, US

    Get directions

Employees at Nouveau Labs

Updates

  • Nouveau Labs reposted this

    View organization page for ServiceNow

    1,495,142 followers

    Most organizations are running AI on a foundation that can't support it. The average enterprise runs 367+ applications across the employee experience alone. Data is siloed. Workflows break the moment they cross from one app to the next. That's why AI isn't delivering. You can't orchestrate what you haven't unified. Find out what your foundation is missing—read the Blueprint for Agentic Business: https://bit.ly/4skIZRE

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • Excited to be working with ServiceNow technology as implementation experts for organizations across industries. Proud to contribute to driving efficiency, innovation, and seamless digital transformation for our clients. Looking forward to delivering more impactful solutions together! #Servicenow #nouveaulabs #servicenowimplementationexperts

    View organization page for ServiceNow

    1,495,142 followers

    Most escalation workflows are broken before a service agent even gets involved. Bell Canada fixed the handoff—not the team.

  • Most finance teams talk about "3-way matching" but don't actually do it. Here's the reality: PO says 100 units. Goods receipt says 95. Invoice says 100. Now what? Manual detective work. When you automate 3-way matching, the system compares all three automatically. Discrepancies are flagged clearly. The right person gets routed. No more digging through emails. Are you doing 3-way matching? Manual or automated? ServiceNow Satya Tummalapenta Sumanpreet Bhatia Shrikant Janagonda #InvoiceProcessing #3WayMatch #FinanceAutomation

  • THE THREE-WAY MATCH REALITY! MOST FINANCE TEAMS TALK ABOUT "3-WAY MATCHING" BUT DON'T ACTUALLY DO IT. Here's what it means: You have three pieces of information: 1. Purchase Order (PO) — What you ordered 2. Goods Receipt (GR) — What you actually received 3. Invoice — What the vendor is charging you for A 3-way match compares all three: - Does the invoice amount match the PO amount? - Does the invoice quantity match what was received? - Are there any discrepancies? If everything matches, the invoice is approved automatically. If something doesn't match, it's flagged for review. Why this matters: Without 3-way matching, you're basically paying invoices without verifying what you ordered, what you received, or what you're paying for. That's how overpayments happen. That's how duplicate invoices slip through. That's how pricing errors don't get caught. With 3-way matching, every invoice is verified against two other sources of truth. The problem: Most companies don't have clean data for all three pieces. The PO might say 100 units, the GR might say 95, and the invoice might be for 100. So manual matching becomes detective work. The automation difference: When you automate 3-way matching: - The system automatically compares all three - It flags discrepancies clearly - It routes them to the right person - The person doesn't have to dig through emails to figure out what happened It's the difference between "this doesn't match, investigate" and "this doesn't match, here's why, here's what to do." Are you doing 3-way matching on your invoices? If so, is it manual or automated? ServiceNow Nouveau Labs Satya Tummalapenta Sumanpreet Bhatia Shrikant Janagonda #InvoiceProcessing #3WayMatch #FinanceAutomation #Accounting

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • THE HIDDEN COST OF EXCEPTIONS!! EVERY INVOICE EXCEPTION COSTS YOU MORE THAN YOU THINK. When an invoice doesn't match the PO, someone has to investigate. That takes time. But it's not just the investigation time. While that invoice sits in exception queue: - Your payment calendar gets delayed - You might miss early payment discounts - The vendor wonders why they haven't been paid - Your AP person is context-switching between invoices If you're processing 100 invoices per month and 30% are exceptions, you're dealing with 30 exception investigations per month. At 30 minutes per investigation, that's 15 hours per month. Over a year, that's 180 hours. That's basically one person's job. But here's the hidden part: That's just the direct time. The indirect costs are usually 2-3x higher: - Early payment discounts missed - Payment delays damaging vendor relationships - Finance team stress and overtime - Decision-making delays due to incomplete data When you automate exception handling: - 80% of exceptions disappear (because they weren't real problems, just routine variations) - The 20% that remain are actually routed to the right person immediately - They're resolved faster because the context is clear - You don't lose early payment discounts The ROI is usually obvious within the first month. How much time is your AP team spending on exceptions right now? ServiceNow Nouveau Labs Satya Tummalapenta Sumanpreet Bhatia Shrikant Janagonda #AccountsPayable #FinanceOperations #ProcessImprovement #ROI #ServiceNow

  • IF YOU'RE STILL PROCESSING INVOICES MANUALLY, YOU'RE WASTING TIME YOUR COMPETITORS AREN'T. Most companies process invoices the same way they did 10 years ago: - Invoice arrives via email - Gets forwarded to AP - Gets compared against PO - Gets approved if it matches - Gets paid And when something doesn't match? You investigate. Result: You're spending hours on work that a system could do in seconds. The average invoice takes 30-45 minutes of human time to process, validate, and approve. For a company processing 100 invoices per month, that's 50-75 hours. That's 1-2 people, full-time. What if you could cut that in half? What if 80% of your invoices processed with zero human touch? The gap between manual and automated invoice processing isn't small improvements. It's a 10x difference in efficiency. The question isn't whether to automate. It's when. Are you still manually processing invoices, or have you started automating? ServiceNow Nouveau Labs Satya Tummalapenta Shrikant Janagonda Sumanpreet Bhatia #InvoiceAutomation #FinanceAutomation #ProcessImprovement #Efficiency

  • Before You Customize Odoo, Read This! Every week we hear: “Can we just customize this?” Of course you can. The real question is: Should you? In Odoo, there are 3 levels of change: - Configuration - Studio / metadata customization - Core module development Jumping to level 3 too quickly creates: • Upgrade headaches • High maintenance cost • Performance issues • Vendor lock-in • Technical debt The best Odoo implementations we’ve led had one rule: Configure first. Extend second. Customize only when strategically necessary. Customization should solve a business bottleneck — not replicate a legacy habit. If your system feels “over-engineered,” it might be time for a customization audit before your next upgrade. Architecture decisions today determine stability for the next 5 years. #Odooimplementation #Nouveaulabs #Odoocustomization Satya Tummalapenta Sunitha V Sumanpreet Bhatia

  • Empowered women empower the world! On this International Women’s Day, let’s recognize the incredible contributions of women in every field — leaders, innovators, entrepreneurs, and change-makers. The future is stronger, smarter, and more inclusive when women thrive. Happy Women’s Day! Moumita Saha Roy Sumanpreet Bhatia Komal Chhabra Navnita Kedar Sunitha V Roopa K Anusha Muralidhara Lakshmi Polisetty Harshitha Dornadula GRACY HEPHZIBAH TIRUPATHI Kanak Gupta Neha Bharti Ramya Kandagatla #InternationalWomensDay #WomenInLeadership #Inclusion #Respect

    • No alternative text description for this image
  • The Costliest Mistake in Odoo Implementations! Most Odoo projects don’t fail because of bad software. They fail because of bad architecture decisions. Here’s the pattern we keep seeing when companies approach us after a troubled implementation: • Everyone has admin access • Customizations everywhere • Reports don’t match accounting • Inventory doesn’t reconcile • Upgrades feel “risky” • Users have lost confidence Odoo is powerful. But power without structure creates chaos. ERP is not installation. It’s architecture. Before writing a single line of code, you should have: ✔ Role & permission design ✔ Workflow mapping ✔ Accounting impact analysis ✔ Upgrade impact thinking ✔ Clear customization boundaries If these weren’t part of your implementation process, you don’t have a system problem. You have a design problem. If you’re currently planning or restructuring an Odoo setup, it’s worth reviewing the foundation before scaling further. Feel free to connect — we are always open to discussing architecture strategy Satya Tummalapenta Sunitha V Sumanpreet Bhatia #OdooImplementation #ERP #Odoo #nouveaulabs #mistakeinodooimplementation

  • Is your vendor invoice processing drowning in exceptions?? Here's what we see in most finance teams: Invoices arrive via email. They get forwarded to AP. Sometimes they match the PO. Sometimes they don't. When they don't match, nobody knows where to route them. Result: Invoices sit in an inbox. Finance can't close the month. Vendors send follow-ups. Somewhere, someone is manually comparing three different spreadsheets. The cost? One AP team member is basically a full-time "invoice exception resolver." But here's the real problem: You're not dealing with an exception problem. You're dealing with a data problem. A client we worked with had the same issue. They were averaging 40% exceptions on invoice processing. They thought the fix was better exception routing. We dug into why exceptions were happening in the first place. Turns out, they were validating invoices against data that was scattered across four different systems: - PO data in SAP - Quotation pricing in Salesforce - Supplier rate cards in a shared Excel folder - Contract terms in email attachments When an invoice came in for validation, the AP team had to manually check all four sources. And since those systems weren't talking to each other, discrepancies were inevitable. Invoice amount didn't match the quote? They'd have to dig through Salesforce. Price was different from last month? They'd have to find the old rate card in the Excel folder. Invoice date seemed wrong? They'd have to search email for the contract. No wonder 40% were exceptions. The fix wasn't smarter exception routing. The fix was centralizing their data. We built a Contract & Reference Data Hub in ServiceNow that pulled all reference data into a single place: ✓ POs synced from SAP via API (real-time) ✓ Quotation pricing pulled from Salesforce (auto-updated) ✓ Supplier rate cards uploaded, versioned, and indexed ✓ Contract terms extracted and tagged using AI Now, when an invoice arrives, validation runs against a single source of truth. No more digging through four systems. No more manual comparison. Invoice amount vs. quote? ✓ Matched in milliseconds Supplier pricing this month vs. last month? ✓ Rate card comparison Invoice dates within contract terms? ✓ Contract data available Backup documents attached? ✓ Verified automatically The results: Exceptions dropped from 40% to 8% (just from centralizing data) Invoice processing went from 45 minutes to 5 minutes Cost benefit for the client as double payments were avoided The real exceptions (pricing disputes, contract mismatches) became obvious instead of buried in noise ServiceNow Nouveau Labs Satya Tummalapenta Sumanpreet Bhatia Shrikant Janagonda #ServiceNow #FinanceAutomation #DataArchitecture #ProcessImprovement #AccountsPayable #APM #OperationsEfficiency

Similar pages

Browse jobs